I want to thank you for coming out and visiting my website giving me the opportunity to express myself freely. I have written copyrights the past 20 plus years as a individual and would like to present my thoughts along with problems and solutions.
As some of you know or might not know, I published my work with www.Publishresearch.com. The company decided to let it's domain expire after further research the company had a complaint filed against it in the whois data base. The domain was listed with dynadot colorful name by the way little humor. I researched the company and found it to be located in San Mateo, California with a office opened in 2011-2013 in China. The company stated they had some type of affiliation with the National Science Foundation-USA, United Kingdom, and Europe. The company promoted Free Science and Technology publishing. My work over 95% was in Science and Technology and copyrighted.
In another event, I found out that a recently deceased scientist was under Cambridge University. The scientist was a well known atheist did not believe in God but the University had a symbol of the cross which brings up some very troubling issues regarding honesty, Integrity, and moral core values regarding Academic Integrity by University's. The reason I am bringing this up is because some of the deceased Physist work used some of my Cryptographic numbers and Models I used in my copyrights specifically Linear, Curvature, Linear and Curvature Motion Kinetic Energy. This person went inside a church and from all appearences took knowledge and work that was not for a secular scientist without fully understanding what the central theme was Intelligent Design-God. This showed a lack of morals, integrity, and for a University that had 10 offices allowed this to go on is very disappointing.
I am not trying to be judgemental in any shape, way or form but there are some very serious issues regarding copyrights that are under the W.I.P.O. World Intellectual Property Organization. A basic tenet of copyright law is the recognition of one's work and to derive a benefit from it. This did not happen after 20 plus years even after having 100,000 plus downloads on my work. I think the W.I.P.O. needs to work more on Individual copyright holders rights to strengthen it against organizations. A person with 30 plus years of experience usually writes from a Individual perspective not tied to a company or organization. I have written my fair share of Mathematics, Physics, and Design based Equations and from the looks of it Countries should make it easier for a Individual to obtain Patents not make it difficult and hard by some countries that do not honor their committments and allow lawyers to sneak into Patent Offices. Copyright holders are required to Publish their work. If you do not wish to have it open to the general public Equations, Than you should change the system to allow Individuals to get their Patents approved not set up one legal barrier after another and turn it over to dishonest lawyers Public Officials and create a system of fraud, abuse, and or mistreatment including discrimatory acts aginst individuals.
On 03/26/2018 Monday, I was called by the USPTO office the person had a English Accent not American. This person stated he was a USPTO lawyer and basically wanted to deny my trademark application filled out by a legal law firm who dealt with trademarks. The classification was 42 Science and Technology they reviewed my website and he wanted to classify it as toys and provided definitions and meaning. I complained to the USPTO only to have it fall on deaf ears. My copyrights, websites, social media, youtube videos contained my service amrk as in use and prescribed by law. The USPTO lawyer wanted to insult. This was on the day where my wife's consulate in Seattle Russia was shut down which infers malicious and inappropiate behavior by "Public Officials".
In conclusion, I applaud the United States for shutting down Intellectual property theft or possibility but on the other side of the coin They allowed a "Friendly Nation" to engage in Intllectual Property thefy by allowing this to continue this is a crime in itself.
I would like to propose the following solutions.
1). Digital Copyrights that are Published have a Computer Generated bar code.
2). Submission of copyrights and registration should have a verifiable mac address that is tied into the IP address. IP addresses can easily be manipulated ;however, A mac address with the IP header with encapsulation privacy might do a better job of cutting down on theft and piracy and easier to trace and track down when needed.
3). Copyright Organizations to review each countries property right laws and make them sign accords and treaties this can be achieved in Geneva or Vienna.
Thank you for allowing me to express my concerns !
Barry L. Crouse Phd Computer Information Systems